Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 13:05
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Do happily married husbands cheat?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
What’s next?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
How would you spank me if I had been sent home from a school camp because of my poor behavior?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
What's the funniest thing you heard in a movie theater?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
U.S. Home Sellers Are Sitting on Nearly $700 Billion Worth of Listings, an All-Time High - Redfin
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Deaths from heart attacks are way down. Here's what's killing us instead - KSL News